Jump to content

DOWNLOAD MODS

Are you looking for something shiny for your load order? We have many exclusive mods and resources you won't find anywhere else. Start your search now...

LEARN MODDING

Ready to try your hand at making your own mod creations? Visit the Enclave, the original ES/FO modding school, and learn the tricks of the trade from veteran modders...

JOIN THE ALLIANCE

Membership is free and registering unlocks image galleries, project hosting, live chat, unlimited downloads, & more...

Stormcloak or Imperial?


Hanaisse
 Share

A curious poll on the Civil war  

76 members have voted

  1. 1. Which side, if any, did you choose in the Civil war?

    • Stormcloak rebels
      29
    • Imperials
      30
    • Neither
      17
    • Both
      6


Recommended Posts

Similar things have happened in the real world and with much smaller places than Summerset Isle (e.g. the British Empire); a few crumbling alliances can leave the way wide open for someone to come along and impose their own rule.

Yes, and none of the lands taken over by the British Empire still belong to them. They did not have the power to keep control of the 'enslaved' countries. That was my whole point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and none of the lands taken over by the British Empire still belong to them. They did not have the power to keep control of the 'enslaved' countries. That was my whole point.

I'm not sure I follow... does the size of the country make a difference? Bigger invaders with huge militaries have also come unstuck (e.g. the Soviet Union) which I think is as much down to internal politics as size or anything else; it just tends to be the fate of empires sooner or later. I'd always just assumed that the Thalmor's dreams of a Tamriel united under their jackboot (or rather one of those chicken-feet boots we saw in Oblivion) would come to a messy end one way or the other anyway... it's just a matter of how it comes about rather than "if".

(Hmm, I think that sounded rather more argumentative than I'd intended. That's what I get for posting before lunch!)

Edited by vometia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I always choose Stormcloaks because while I don't agree with everything that they've done or stand for, I can sympathize with their cause. I wouldn't want an empire that surrendered to the Thalmor to rule over me either, especially since we already suceeded from them them. They spread themselves too thing before and couldnt protect themselves, why should we let them rule us again?

And I'm sure that the fact that, in my playthroughs, an argonian helps them is kind of like a kick in the seat to the imperials. XD

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Civil War Arguments

 

The moral and governing failures of the Empire

 
There have been multiple examples of the Empire's failings in history to their people. The relevant ones I'll give are Valenwood, and Morrowind, then later Hammerfell.

"In 4E 29, the government of Valenwood was overthrown by Thalmor collaborators and a union with Alinor proclaimed. It appears that Thalmor agents had formed close ties to certain Bosmeri factions even before the Oblivion Crisis. The Empire and its Bosmer allies, caught completely off guard, were quickly defeated by the much-better prepared Altmer forces that invaded Valenwood on the heels of the coup. Thus was the Aldmeri Dominion reborn." -The Great War (book)

This was likely possible due to the early negligence of the Empire during the Imperial Simulacrum, which admittedly was not the Empire's fault, as the Emperor was at the time held captive and was replaced by Jagar Tharn. But even after this happened, the Empire allowed themselves to be caught off guard by the Thalmor, and had no idea that they had secretly sided with Bosmer in Valenwood, and was completely taken by surprise when they decided to take it. Now, this was a simple error on their part, and no one can truly blame them for this, as the Thalmor are crafty and no one saw this coming. Even so, the civilians in Valenwood are the ones who are paying, as the game has hinted to us through Delphine that the Thalmor are doing some Ethic Cleansing. But After something like this, and after the Khajiit seceded to join the Dominion after they claimed they returned the moons that disappeared (the moons are a big part of Khajiit culture), you'd think the Empire would have taken the Thalmor as a more serious threat.

Go back a bit and look at Morrowind. During the Oblivion Crisis, the Empire, according to the DLC "Dragonborn", abandoned their provinces in an attempt to protect Cyrodil. They left Morrowind among other provinces unprotected to save themselves, and left everyone to the mercy of the Daedra. Morrowind citizens now resent the Empire despite it not being the same Dynasty. The developers made it a point for us to see that in game npc's still treat this Empire as the Third and same Empire, despite this one being the Mede Dynasty.This is likely because even though the Emperor is different, the way the Empire or maybe the Elder Council operates is inherently the same. An example of this is Hammerfell.

Hammerfell during the Great War was attacked simultaneously with Cyrodiil by the Thalmor. Hammerfell at the time was in a state of constant infighting (note that they interfered in Skyrim's infighting, but not Hammerfell's) and were taken by surprise when the Thalmor came in. Later during the war when the Thalmor sacked the Imperial city, the Empire ordered General Decianus to abandon his post and return to the Imperial City. If it were up to the ones in charge, the Empire would have completely abandoned Hammerfell right then and there. Luckily, the General decided to disobey his order, and discharged a large force of "invalids" to fight in Hammerfell.


All this shows that even though the Empire has not always been under the same dynasty, they still treat their provinces the same. As expendable. Valenwood was simply an error on their part, but when you look at all these failings, it is clear that the Empire is just unable to protect their provinces whether it be their fault or not.

 


After the heroic efforts of the Nords, Imperials and Bretons, even admittedly Titus Mede himself, the Empire finally took back the Imperial city. After this happened, the Empire signed the infamous White Gold Concordat, which would 1. Outlaw Talos Worship, and 2. Give away almost Half of Hammerfell to the Thalmor (admittedly already occupied by the elves.) While the Empire themselves could not afford to fight on, neither could the Thalmor. I used to believe that they could not know the Thalmor were as weak as they were, but the Great War book states that the info in the book was taken from the Thalmor themselves:

Author's Note: Much of what is written in this book is pieced together from documents captured from the enemy during the war, interrogation of prisoners, and eyewitness accounts from surviving soldiers and Imperial officers.

And the book clearly states:


In 4E 174, the Thalmor leadership committed all available forces to the campaign in Cyrodiil, gambling on a decisive victory to end the war once and for all.

This means the Empire had a good idea of the Thalmor's state, but bought into their bluff anyway when they signed the White Gold Concordat. The Redguards of Hammerfell did not wish to give up their land so easy and wanted to fight on. The Empire instead of at least giving supplies to the Redguards or some kind of non combatant support instead just completely dropped Hammerfell as a province. They say they were forced, but the Thalmor, as they apparently knew, could not force anything. The Thalmor wouldn't be in any position to assault Cyrodiil for sending supplies even if they wanted to. You may be thinking that the Empire would need those supplies to rebuild, and you'd be right. But the cost of a whole Province being lost is greater than at least meager support of military supplies so Hammerfell could defend itself, and take back it's land. Now the Empire is out yet another Province, and they only have two, not counting Cyrodiil.

To reiterate.
 
 

http://forums.bethso...orn/?p=22489750

 

 

The “Skyrim cannot survive aloneâ€-argument

 
 
This one is one of the simpler arguments to debunk, because any high school dropout can look at the map and see how silly this argument is. Here. http://www.google.co...9QEwAA&dur=1510

Lets look at the two ways a military force can invade a territory. The first possibility is by Land. If the Thalmor were to attempt this, they'd need to go through either Morrowind (not allies of the Thalmor, and never have been, plus Argonians occupy part of it and are fighting the Dark Elves) or Hammerfell (obviously hostile to the Dominion) or through Cyrodiil. Now many say that there's the solution. The Thalmor have a treaty with the Empire, and they are allowed through Cyrodiil and Skyrim. Two things. One, the Justiciars are allowed, and two, whole armies are clearly not. How do I know this? Tullius himself says at the Empire is currently guarding it's border to watch for an attack from the Dominion. Think about that for a sec. If the Thalmor were allowed to walts in whenever they wanted, why the hell is the Empire wasting their time guarding their borders? It makes no sense. Clearly the deal of the Thalmor in their territory extends solely to Justiciars for hunting down "heretics" not their whole army.

Now look at Skyrim's natural barriers. Mountains. The worst kind. You cannot sustain an flow of troops and supplies through a mountain range. Not easily anyway. Couple that with the intense weather, and you have a complete supply chain disaster. Now, the Thalmor, assuming they actually did get through Cyrodiil in whatever fashion still would have trouble getting through even if they used the Pale Pass, due to it's treacherous reputation. Here's an example of how it caused trouble for Tullius during the Stormcloak rebellion:

%5B5%5D In 4E 201, the Pale Pass was closed due to avalanches, preventing Imperial reinforcements from helping to secure Falkreath Hold under Imperial control during the Stormcloak Rebellion.%5B6%5D%5B7%5D

In short, a land invasion is highly unlikely in the current situation. I didn't even talk about the obvious disadvantage of fighting in a cold climate that the Thalmor are not at all used to fighting in (their homeland is SUMMERSET ISLE for Talos's sake) against a people who are literally magically resistant to cold weather and magic.

Now lets look at what the Thalmor are actually good at. Naval invasion. The Thalmor are known to have the most advanced and powerful naval force in Tamriel. But even the most advanced naval ships cannot successfully invade without a safe port nearby to house reinforcements and supplies to sustain the attack. See how far away Summerset Isle is? It would be comically impractical to invade Skyrim from this far away, whether that be by land or sea. Even our real life history proves this fact to be true. The Thalmor can't set one on the coast of Skyrim to the North because one, they'd be under constant attack, and two, the Sea of Ghosts is as the name suggests extremely treacherous. They don't have any islands nearby to do this either. The only possibility they have is to anger the Dark Elves as well, and take one of those islands that are literally on the opposite side of Tamriel from Summerset Isle. Then they'd be fighting two nearby nations at the same time, and this time one of them is magically adept, and are as tough as the Nords are. So without a true safe port, this invasion tactic is even more unlikely to succeed.

This is why I personally laugh at those who say "without the Empire in Skyrim, the Stormcloaks are doomed." The Nords could literally sit back and gulp down some Black-Briar mead while the land does the fighting for them.
 

 

The “racist†accusations towards Ulfric and the "racist" accusations towards the Stormcloak faction

 
Nothing gives me a headache more than debating over this. Before I start, I would like to show you the definition of "racism".

  • The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as...
  • Prejudice or discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief.

First off, I'd like to say almost everyone in this game is "technically" racist, because they believe certain races are good at certain things, and discriminate against them because of it. Whether that be Nords thinking elves are physically weak, or Imperials thinking Nords are axe swinging barbarians, or Altmer thinking men as a whole are less intellegent. Only thing is, in Tamriel, some of these things are based from truth! But lets assume it is not, and look at the claims of racism to the Stormcloaks.

1. The Stormcloaks don't allow Khajiit in the city.

First of all, the Nords as a whole don't let the caravans in cities because they have a reputation of selling skooma, moonsugar, and thieving. I can't prove that they steal, but anyone can go up to them and see that they sell skooma and moonsugar, and if you listen, they can be heard among themselves complaining about "shakes" from not having any moonsugar. So on top of dealing, they also are users.

2. "Skyrim belongs to the Nords!"

All Nords say this battlecry. Even the Nords in the legion. It is a generic cry that can be heard from all nord npc's and should not be taken as racist. Nords as a whole are actually Nationalist and Xenophobic. Meaning they take great pride in their heretical history and background, and they are distrusting of outsiders. Not certain races, but outsiders. Even as a nord, the player can sometimes have a stormcloak in Windhelm say "You better not be an Imperial spy!" Now, some Nords are clearly racist, but this should not be generalised to all. Xenophobia and Nationalism are regulalry mistaken for racism.

3. Stormcloaks hate all elves

This is the easiest to debunk. Firstly, there is a difference between racism and prejudice. If the Stormcloaks truly hated all elves, why are there not one, not two, not three, but four Altmer npcs in the city who are not only not in the grey quarters, but are merchants? One of them says the Dunmer have themselves to blame because they are not willing to do what it takes to gain the nord's respect. Some of the Dunmer are though, as one from house Hlaalu owns a farm, and the other works on the farm and clearly dislikes the complaining his people does ans he refers to his brother saying he'd rather work than to "harp on about injustices" like his brother. Keep in mind that the Dunmer even has Nords in Windhelm working for him! Now, like I said, the Nords do have some racist people like the two in the front when you first walk into Windhelm, and the dock worker who has Argonian workers, but the Stormcloak's agenda is not a racist one, although they of course have some bad apples.

Moving on to Ulfric himself, a lot of the points previously described can be applied to his so called "racism" as well. First, Ulfric did not segregate the Dunmer, the High King during the time of the Red Mountain exploding did.

http://www.uesp.net/...ree_of_Monument

"Let it stand in honor of those who had the strength and spirit to accept Skyrim's Offer "untithed to any thane or hold, and self-governed, with free worship, with no compensation to Skyrim or the Empire except as writ in the Armistice of old wheresoever those might still apply, and henceforth let no Man or Mer say that the Sons and Daughters of Kyne are without mercy or honor."

This shows that Ulfric has these elves in his city, and they don't have to pay taxes, and they are supposed to be self governed. Yet they were still allowed in the city, which Ulfric still lets them stay, and they don't have to give the Nords squat in return. The poor nords in the city aren't even given free room and board.

Edit: Some game dialogue reveals that the Dunmer possibly do actually pay taxes, so this deal may have been altered over time. I'm leaving this section in in case this is only taxes from businesses, since the Dunmer in question is a business owner. At any rate, the Dunmer were given a place to stay, and originally did not pay taxes, and originally didn't have to give the Nords anything, and they let the Grey Quarter go to crap with the oppertunity.
 
Here's a good argument against this that suggests the Dunmer do not in fact pay taxes.
 


http://forums.bethso...elm/?p=22588230
 

 


Ulfric wouldn't allow Altmer in his city when he was tortured by the Thalmor if he hated elves, and he wouldn't allow Dark Elves to work in the market or own farmland if he was racist or prejudiced either. Now, one good point some people have brought up is his segregation of Argonians out of the city. The definition of racism is in fact discrimination of a race, but he is segregating them because of their people's history with the Dark elves, not because of some prejudice against them or a belief about their race. The Argonians are known for being suddenly overtaken by the hist. This is what happened when the Argonians attacked Morowind, presumably out of revenge for their slavery in Morrowind. Ulfric is in the middle of a civil war, and would be a fool to take chances of increasing civil unrest, especially if it could get violent. The Empire could easily take advantage of that with riots in the streets if this were to actually happen.



Also keep in mind that Ulfric says nothing racist or prejudiced, and there's no actual evidence of his racism or prejudice anywhere.
 
 

 

Ulfric is a Power-Hungry Barbarian, The “Ulfric murdered the High Kingâ€-argument, and The issue of Ulfric killing Torygg instead of talking to him.

 
An argument that is commonly defended is that Ulfric is power hungry and a savage. To those who say he's power hungry, you're right. Congradulations. But is that a bad thing? I assume when people say this, they mean that he is power hungry for the sake of power alone. That is false. He wants power so that he can do what his supporters want him to, which is to save Skyrim from the Empire's influence and restore Talos worship. Don't believe me? Does this sound like the words of one who fights for the sake of having power alone?



For those of you who say he's just acting...come on, really? In his palace with the grand total of one stranger? No.

People also say him killing Torygg is proof of his hunger for power, because his court mage says he was a fan of him, and he agreed with what Ulfric was saying, and Ulfric should have talked to him first. Do you see the contradiction? Torygg's court wizard says Torygg knew of his agenda, and Ulfric stated them at the last moot to the point to where he spoke just shy of treason. Torygg, the High King of Skyrim should have said something then if he agreed. And they say he should have asked Torygg one last time before he issued his challenge, but from Ulfric's perspective this would have been stupid. He's in the middle of the Imperial seat of power in Skyrim at the mercy of the Emperor's greatest Skyrim supporter who swore an oath to him, and showed no evidence of agreeing with Ulfric at the moot, and Ulfric is supposed to risk being arrested for treason in the belly of the beast?

A counter argument to this is he just killed the High King, so obviously he didn't care about that to begin with. This is wrong, because Ulfric challenged him to a legal duel according to Skyrim's laws and would not have been arrested. A duel is a part of Nord politics, and after a duel is won, if the High King is dead, they have another moot, and pick a new High King. People say it is an outdated law, but Torygg agreed to the duel, so clearly the law is still in place. It was only an issue after the Empire came in and said it was illegal acording to Imperial law. So Ulfric went in knowing that he wouldn't be arrested for challenging the King to a duel. This is a political checkmate. Either Torygg agrees to the duel and he wins, and a moot is held, which Ulfric would have won due to being the winner, since Elisif likely would back down out of fear to him, or Torygg doesn't accept, and Ulfric has a good chance of winning due to Torygg looking weak. Either way if the Empire did not interfere, Ulfric may very well have been the new High King.

This does not sound like the workings of a savage to me. It sounds like one who knows his people's politics and knew how to play them well. People may think he's savage only because of the nature of the Nordic politics, which is outdated compared to non combat loving countries. Ulfric can't be held accountable for playing the politics. He didn't make the rules. And as said before, Ulfric did not murder the High King, he fought Torygg in a duel. Whether you think it was dishonorable or what have you is a different issue. Torygg knew that Ulfric had the Thu'um, and accepted the fight anyway. He also knew he was a seasoned warrior, and likely still would have lost the fight. To Nords, a duel to the death even with the thu'um that is revered in their culture is not dishonorable or cowardly. His use of the thu'um simply shows he was the stronger. Whether you believe that or not isn't the point. The Nords do.

Also: http://forums.bethso...-me/?p=22498185

 

 

Indeed. Which means Ulfric would have wasted his time talking further, and he made the right call.


Another piece of evidence against Ulfric is "The Bear of Markarth". http://www.uesp.net/...ear_of_Markarth

First, this book, while obvious propaganda to make Ulfric look very bad is filled with holes.

The prisoners don't even say Ulfric's name in Markarth, and as Tdroid said, the Jarl contradicts this book and even says he's the one who caused all this.

 

 

http://forums.bethso...no3/?p=22397367

 

 

And speaking of Markarth, for people saying Ulfric started the whole Talos ban enforcement because of the Markarth incident, you're wrong. Talk to the Jarl. He admits he came to Ulfric and asked for his assistance, and he offered HIM Talos worship, not the other way around. And when the Thalmor found out, Ulfric was left holding the bag.

 

 

“Ulfric misused the Voiceâ€

 
This point is irrelevant, as the only people who follow this are the Grey Beards, and Ulfric who was training to be one was taken as a child to be one. While he does not seem to resent the Grey Beards for this, it still shows that he can't be held accountable for an oath he didn't willfully make. It is however possible that he was willing to make the oath, but he was still a child, and this was before his home was in turmoil. The Thu'um is clearly a weapon meant to be used. In the Nord pantheon, Kynareth, or Kyne to the Nords is a warrior goddess:

Jump to: navigation, search
Kyne (Kiss At The End), or Kaan in the dragon language, is the Nordic goddess of the Storm, widow of Shor, Warrior-Wife, and a favored god of warriors

Why would a warrior goddess give the Nords a power that is clearly meant as a weapon to be passive? Jurgen Windcaller only suddenly "realised this" after the Dunmer whooped him silly, then forced other Thu'umers into his way of thinking, claiming the gods punished them for their misuse of the Thu'um. This is a clear case of "Hurtfeelioma". Even with using the Thu'um, Ulfric still says he doesn't use it lightly. Ulfric did not misuse the thu'um. The Grey Beards say otherwise, but Arngeir also thinks you're wrong for using Dragonrend on Alduin to save the world.
 

 

The “Trade being hurtâ€

 
Trade at first will possibly be hurt, as the court wizard of Solitude says, but it will most likely pick up again, if it even drops at all. Why?

1. The trade between the two, namely Cyrodiil and Windhelm is just too important. Both provinces will need to keep up trade, because both are dependent on resources from eachother, and both need to rebuild, especially the Empire. They can't afford to cut themselves off of Skyrim's resources.

2. The East Empire Trading Company still opperates out of Windhelm. If trade was going to be an issue, why would they still work with the rebels and trade? Either the Company despite its leaders being originally appointed by the Emperor doesn't listen to the Empire, or the Empire simply can't afford to hault trade, and neither can Skyrim.

So because of these two reasons, it seems highly unlikely that trade will cease with Skyrim. Maybe it will deteriorate temporarily, but it is doubtful. Especially when the two are in war prep for the next Great War against the Thalmor.

Edited by ColonelKillaBee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Although I love the empire, my heart has always stayed Nord. When I got to choose I thought it over. I had no intention of letting the imperials meddling too much with the affairs of Skyrim and it's culture. But I do not swear Ulfric as my Jarl or high king. I would gladly liberate the whole of Tamriel from the Thalmor, but I would begin with ridding my homeland from it's occupiers.

 

Ulfric is no good as a leader of the land. Since I only see conflict in his eyes and hate. I would do so much more, I would carry my axe with pride and love for my beloved Skyrim. Everyone who wants to exploit Skyrim and limit it's culture has to answer for it's crimes.

 

My Dunmer side look down upon Ulfric for just seeing them as parasites. But my Dunmer side also admires the honour and the pride of the nords.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Although I love the empire, my heart has always stayed Nord. When I got to choose I thought it over. I had no intention of letting the imperials meddling too much with the affairs of Skyrim and it's culture. But I do not swear Ulfric as my Jarl or high king. I would gladly liberate the whole of Tamriel from the Thalmor, but I would begin with ridding my homeland from it's occupiers.

 

Ulfric is no good as a leader of the land. Since I only see conflict in his eyes and hate. I would do so much more, I would carry my axe with pride and love for my beloved Skyrim. Everyone who wants to exploit Skyrim and limit it's culture has to answer for it's crimes.

 

My Dunmer side look down upon Ulfric for just seeing them as parasites. But my Dunmer side also admires the honour and the pride of the nords.

After hearing his words to galmar when you walk in his palace, I have to ask how do you see only hate? There is of course hate there, but that is for the thalmor and the dominion forces Empire who let them in. And the conflict would be the civil war. As for parasites, they don't contribute to the war effort yet want more help. They don't pay taxes, they dont answer to Ulfric as their agreement says the dunmer refugees are to be self governed, and yet they are still allowed free room and board, yet proclaim because they work (to get money for themselves) that they somehow are contributing? The Hlaalu farm owner, sure, but what is owning a tavern doing for the war effort? Parasites isn't far off or out of their realm of possibility.

Edited by ColonelKillaBee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Even if you're roleplaying as an elven race, the Thalmor aren't exactly going to embrace you necessarily. Didn't they do some nasty ethnic cleansing when they took over Valenwood? I also get the impression their takeover of Summerset Isle was done with some atrocities. Also they're regime sounds very harsh. Their dossiers refer to them sending their own people to "re-education camps".

 

I fully support the Empire. There's no such thing as the "nord way" or whatever, the Empire arguably started in Skyrim and it's part of Skyrim's culture. I mean the Empire is Talos' empire. Siding with the Nords in my opinion is extremely short sighted and really just falls into the Thalmor's plan of weakenining the Empire further. I mean, logistically Skyrim would be a nightmare for invasion. It's far away from Alinor/Summerset Isle, and it's harsh environment certain favours the natives. But if they actually want to defeat the Thalmor, keeping Skyrim united in my opinion is the best way. Don't agree with the Emperor's plan? Hire the dark brotherhood to assassinate him and put someone else in charge. Dissolving the entire Empire seems pretty stupid.

Edited by ContagiousCure
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though I've played one character on each side, I'll go with my first run. Stormcloak all the way. Legate Rikke deserved the knife she got in her gullet later for so casually condemning me to the block. The Empire is weak and must be purged and even though Ulfric is a racist pig, he still allowed a lizard to fight for the cause.

I didn't think that female officer at the start was Legate Rikki. If you go withe the Stormcloaks, don't you kill said officer in the Helgen tower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I didn't think that female officer at the start was Legate Rikki. If you go withe the Stormcloaks, don't you kill said officer in the Helgen tower?

Indeed.  Same VA so I think that accounts for the mistake, but Rikke was not at Helgen.

 

*snip*

I fully support the Empire. There's no such thing as the "nord way" or whatever, the Empire arguably started in Skyrim and it's part of Skyrim's culture. I mean the Empire is Talos' empire. Siding with the Nords in my opinion is extremely short sighted and really just falls into the Thalmor's plan of weakenining the Empire further. I mean, logistically Skyrim would be a nightmare for invasion. It's far away from Alinor/Summerset Isle, and it's harsh environment certain favours the natives. But if they actually want to defeat the Thalmor, keeping Skyrim united in my opinion is the best way. Don't agree with the Emperor's plan? Hire the dark brotherhood to assassinate him and put someone else in charge. Dissolving the entire Empire seems pretty stupid.

I'm reluctant to get into this debate over here, but no, that calculation is faulty.  What's left of the empire at greater strength couldn't defeat the Dominion before, so what makes you think they will the 2nd time around?  Rather, the empire won the military campaign and lost the political campaign, which I think highlights the fact that they no longer have their mythic grounding.  This is TES after all, so geopolitical (nirnpolitical?) factors are less important than mythic ones.  There are no dragonfires, the Alessian pact is over, and it shows.  Now I think the locus of anti-Thalmor resistance is in the individual provinces who are resisting the Thalmor, in the "make way" of the redguard, the Nords' pride in their role as always returning Skyrim to their control, and potentially also in the survivor spirit of the Redoran, as well as the fact that the Thalmor themselves are usurpers and perverters of the Altmer way and will probably collapse from within as well as without.

 

I do think it likely that there will be a Dominion even after the Thalmor are booted out (by the Psijic if by no one else), and that the empire is on its way out no matter what the outcome of an individual playthrough in TESV.  And, I welcome that change.  Another Cyrodiilic empire reboot is the dullest outcome I can imagine.

Edited by Celan
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Empire has already lost. Why would I drag Skyrim down with them by letting the Thalmor run around Skyrim with the lost Empire?

 

Lost you ask? Well, look at the facts. The Thalmor run the Empire now, with puppet leaders. Its obvious by the way the Thalmor have a say in everything that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The Thalmor don't run the empire. Concordat's purpose wasn't so they could control the empire but rather so they could maintain a presence within the empire for intelligence and sabotage. And it's doing just that, they've delayed the Legion's rebuilding efforts when they demanded the Talos ban be enforced in Skyrim after the Markarth incident, thereby triggering the civil war.

 

I don't actually think the Thalmor are that strong from a military standpoint. Hammerfell is a clear example of that (even if Redguards are regarded as the best fighters in Tamriel). At the same time, I don't think the Empire will completely collapse. The imperials, as their name suggests, I believe will always have some kind of Empire, but it definitely won't be to the same magnitute as it was in the beginning of the 3rd Era - and I think that's a good thing for the sake of variety. *SPOILER ALERT* The DB questline loosely implies the Elder Council are actively seeking to replace the current Emperor. Nonetheless I don't think the Empire will regain its strength without some inspiring figure like a Dragonborn (unless Beth decides to skip another 200 years and write that the Last Dragonborn's descendents took the Imperial throne).

 

Alinor is a huge mystery. But I get a sense the Thalmor takeover was a bloody one. I have no evidence for this, just a feeling. Also one of the Imperial Legates makes reference to ethnic cleansing of various woodelves in Valenwood? I'd be surprised if there wasn't some resistence effort brewing up. If the Thalmor are to be defeated, it'll be internally. But I think they're here to stay for a while because an evil dominion is a useful plot device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thalmor may have a little larger hand in running the Empire than you give them credit for, though I generally agree with your view that their main purpose is intelligence and monkey-wrenching. If they stationed an "advisor" with the Archmage in Winterhold, I would bet that Cyrodiil is just crawling with such "advisors" at the elbows of anyone with any power, and many of them may be less resistant to "suggestions" than Saeros was.

 

The Valenwood situation was mentioned by Delphine, explaining why Malborn was willing to help in Diplomatic Immunity. It isn't ethnic cleansing she mentioned, but purges, presumably of recalcitrant, powerful Bosmer and their families.

 

I don't believe there was much bloodshed involved in the Thalmor rise to power in Alinor. I'll have to look, but I seem to recall a book stating that power was given to them during the Oblivion crisis because it was believed they could provide protection. I expect it was something like the trick they pulled on the Khajiit to get control of Elsweyr. I suspect the Thalmor much prefer subterfuges like that over overt, wide-scale bloodshed. Assassinations, kidnappings, and the like -- limited, clandestine violence -- backing up their psychological warfare seems more their style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a rare gaming decision...to base my actions in a quest off of the measured consideration I would show in reality. For in-game politics.

 

Needless to say, I was impressed with how Bethesda handled fictionalized politics.

 

The first difficulty in choosing a side is being a US citizen playing a game influenced by European lore. No matter how familiar I am with the fantasy genre or how many books I read and games I play, the idea of nationality and political influence being nearly synonymous with racial identity in such a pervasive way that they cannot be separated by most characters is a very amusing lodestone. Even if Bethesda were to code in a path to peace and compromise, it probably would not include the Dragonborn singlehandedly bringing concepts like individualism and a pan-racial sense of unity to the forefront of Nord culture.

 

Given this, then, you have to throw out all sides as wrong. The Thalmor want to dominate, the Nords want to rule themselves (and probably fight back against the Thalmor, whether with/for the Imperials or on their own), the Imperials want to keep managing everything while appeasing the Nords and Thalmor. Ulfric and the Empire are equally puppets of the Thalmor...I can't get into much detail about this without spoilers, but they are. Either side I choose will win through some quest chain, but realistically the Nords simply wouldn't defeat the Empire, and if either side gained too much traction, the Thalmor Embassy would be there to balance the scales either openly or covertly. Ulfric can certainly be sympathized with in wanting to drive every last Thalmor out of Skyrim, and unfortunately one can't easily draw a clear line between liberation and racism, due to the complex interests of the Thalmor. Individually, there seem to be at least a few Thalmor who have no strong sympathies regarding the White-Gold Concordat and just want to conduct trade or make their living. Then you have various unaffiliated parties, thieves or exiles or cases like Brand-Shei. The Gray Quarter certainly isn't a nice thing, but at the same time the Thalmor do not tend to show proud scruples like the Altmer, and may very well be putting on an act to appear much more wretched than they are (contrast with the Argonians and Khajiit, who are mistrusted and downtrodden by both sides and take it all with sarcastic humor/quiet resolve).

 

Of course, as a player I know that whichever side I choose will eventually win after the dramatic sacrifice of a few named NPCs on both sides, and as a player I'm sure both questlines are intriguing, rewarding, and the only real opportunity to participate in battles. However, as a character, all I want to do is sit down with the Greybeards and both sides again, tell Ulfric to stop grandstanding and Tullius to stop whining when he's getting good deals, and work things out.

 

If the Stormcloaks are too violent and racially motivated, the Empire is too inflexible and fascist. Stormcloaks kill those who oppose them, but the Empire may kill random people if they are found in suspicious circumstances or for relatively minor crimes. It's prone to corruption, curries favor for and makes underhanded deals with the Thalmor, and has no true justice. Talos worship is outlawed. At first this may not seem like such a big deal - Talos is a newer god, a seeming self-insert fan-fiction bit of religion, a bit cultish really given that it is the supposed rise of a man to a god. Keep in mind that the Dragonborn does not have any innate knowledge of the events which transpired in previous Elder Scrolls games. However, if you've read up on your elven pantheon legends, and if you actually stop and listen and consider the bold ranting of the Talos prophet in Whiterun, you begin to understand. The mer consider themselves direct children of the gods that are, and the men do not, therefore in the view of the mer, the races of men acknowledge themselves as beneath mer. This, combined with their longevity and near-universal magical affinity, gives them the superiority complex which is so common. Having a man directly ascended to a god in the main pantheon is not necessarily mankind's way of asserting dominance or sueriority, as much as it is a way of establishing equality...besides, don't forget about Vivec and pals and the whole Thalmor belief complex. Honestly,  the choice is racial supremacy and religious oppression or racial supremacy and further warmongering. The loose parallels to colonial times are apparent, and I'm as morally conflicted and undecided as the politicians in 1776 were. Why can't we all just get along? (Looking at you as well, Blades and Greybeards)

 

The Stormcloaks have Skyrim and the Nords in mind, the Empire has a far larger area to think about, one which apparently cannot withstand the Thalmor. The Blades are broken, Tamriel is subdued. If I do free Skyrim, beyond the scope of the game dialogue and the quests, wouldn't I be making things worse for the rest of the regions and races under the Empire?

 

I've talked to the rogues and the acolytes, the warriors and the mages and the smiths and the merchants, the inn-keepers and the drunks, the leaders and the followers, wise and foolish, well-meaning zealots, distressed scholars, manipulative criminals, war widows and orphans from children in villages to Elisif the Fair, and it's tearing everyone apart, but neither side can back down without more damage and losing important rights, important people. It makes me want to become the benevolent dictator for life, but even if the game allowed it, isn't an absolute leader exactly what I travelled to Blackreach and Sovnegarde and fought so hard to prevent? Besides, who am I to talk? Sure I could make fair laws, but it means nothing if you don't practice what you preach and lead by example. Even if no one knows it, I'm the one who's crushing dreams and trashing the economy, cleaning out houses of all of their gold and jewels and enchanted items. I'm just another part of the problem with Alduin gone.

 

There is no solution, no happy ending, and everyone on every side is wrong, especially the ones in charge. It's just like real life. You win, Bethesda. I get it. Time passes, people make decisions and try their best and die sooner or later, mountains crumble, eras and worlds shift and replace one another, but...

 

...but war...war never changes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...